Deadline warning: Do not use this page to calculate a live filing, appeal, notice or limitation deadline. Timing can depend on valid notice, location, policy wording, discoverability, extensions and special statutory rules. Obtain legal advice promptly.
Legal framework and scope
Immigration judicial review under section 72 of IRPA begins with an application for leave. The statutory text distinguishes matters arising in Canada from those arising outside Canada and uses notification or awareness as the timing trigger. Classification, service, extensions and the interaction with any statutory appeal are legal questions; a generic calendar calculation is unsafe.
The leave record is advocacy on a defined administrative record. The memorandum should identify a material reviewable error and explain why it affected the decision. Reasonableness review asks whether the reasons are justified, transparent and intelligible in light of the evidence and legal constraints. Fairness review asks whether the procedure required in context was provided. Neither standard invites the Court simply to choose the outcome it prefers.
If leave is granted, the application proceeds to a hearing on the Court's schedule and record. A successful application commonly results in the decision being set aside and returned for redetermination by a different decision-maker, where appropriate. The Court generally does not issue the visa or status itself. Appeal from the judicial-review judgment is restricted by IRPA's certified-question regime; that differs from the rule that no appeal lies from a leave decision.
Options and issues at a glance
| Stage | Main work | Possible result |
|---|---|---|
| Commencement | Identify decision, notification, relief and grounds | Application issued, served and filed |
| Leave record | Affidavit material where proper, record and legal memorandum | Leave granted or dismissed in writing |
| Judicial review | Tribunal record, further permitted material and oral submissions | Application allowed or dismissed |
| Redetermination | New decision by the responsible authority | Outcome may still be positive or negative |
Step-by-step process
Jurisdiction and timing
Section 72 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act requires leave. It provides filing periods tied to whether the matter arose in or outside Canada, while also permitting an extension for special reasons. Notification, awareness, location and procedural context require legal assessment.
The leave record
The applicant's memorandum should identify material errors rather than merely disagree with the outcome. The record must be accurate, organized and tied to the reasons. New evidence is generally restricted because the Court reviews the decision that was actually made on the record before the decision-maker.
Reasonableness and fairness
Reasonableness review examines whether the decision is justified, transparent and intelligible in relation to legal and factual constraints. Procedural fairness concerns the process: notice, opportunity to respond, impartiality and the procedure required in context.
Remedies and expectations
If the application succeeds, the common remedy is to set aside the decision and return it for redetermination, sometimes with directions. The Court generally does not substitute its own visa, permit or status decision.
Advanced file analysis
Grounds should be framed at the level of the reasons, not as broad labels. An allegation that a decision is unreasonable should identify the finding, the legal or evidentiary constraint, the contradiction or gap in the reasoning, and why the defect is material. A fairness ground should specify the procedure that was required, what was not provided and what responsive information could have been offered. Courts generally require more than the possibility that another decision-maker might have reached a different result.
Record discipline affects credibility. Counsel should reconcile the refusal, written reasons, GCMS or tribunal material, affidavits and exhibits, and should identify any objection to evidence that was not before the decision-maker. The requested relief must match the ground. If redetermination is sought, the client should understand that a new officer may reach the same outcome through adequate reasons after considering the matter again.
Evidence and document strategy
Preserve originals, attachments, delivery information, metadata and complete versions. A focused record tied to the applicable legal test is usually more useful than an unstructured volume of documents.
- Decision, reasons and notification evidence
- Complete application or tribunal record
- Chronology of all material communications
- Prior counsel or representative file
- Information about removal or parallel proceedings
| Evidence quality | Quality-control question |
|---|---|
| Authenticity | Who created or issued it, when, and can the source be verified? |
| Relevance | Which disputed fact or legal test does it address? |
| Completeness | Are pages, translations or surrounding communications missing? |
| Consistency | Does it fit the forms, chronology, testimony and earlier records? |
| Weight | Is it first-hand, contemporaneous and sufficiently specific? |
Fictional worked example
Hypothetical: an officer refuses a work permit after stating that no evidence links the applicant's experience to the offered position. The filed record contains detailed employer letters addressing the very duties at issue. The court question is not whether the applicant is generally qualified; it is whether the reasons meaningfully grapple with a central part of the record and remain defensible under the governing criteria.
This fictional example does not describe an Azimi Law client and does not predict an outcome.
Common mistakes
- Treating the Court as a new application
- Using affidavit evidence to rewrite the original case
- Listing conclusions instead of reviewable errors
- Ignoring the remedy and redetermination risk
- Assuming filing automatically stays removal
Questions people ask
No. The Court first decides leave in writing. Only a granted leave application proceeds to the judicial-review hearing.
IRPA states that no appeal lies from the leave decision. Different rules govern a judgment after judicial review and any certified question.
Not generally. The effect on removal depends on the underlying proceeding and law; a separate stay motion may be necessary.
Official sources
Rules and government guidance may change. Review the current source and obtain advice for a live matter.
Preparing a judicial-review application?
A boutique, client-first injury and immigration firm on your side — in English or Farsi. Free · No win, no fee.
Want a free, no-obligation review?
Leave your email and a member of Azimi Law will reach out about your situation. Using this guide is always free and private — sharing your email is entirely optional.