Azimi Law has acted on over 1,000 matters since 2016 — representing both plaintiffs and defendants in personal injury, disability, civil, and immigration proceedings across Ontario. The results below reflect a selection of personal injury and immigration outcomes. Past results are not a guarantee of future outcomes.
Important disclosure: Past results are not a guarantee of future outcomes. Every case turns on its unique facts, evidence, and applicable law. These summaries are provided for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Nothing on this page should be construed as a representation regarding the likely outcome of your matter.
The following represent a selection of matters where Azimi Law acted for injured plaintiffs. Each case is unique — results depend on the specific facts, injuries, and circumstances involved.
Personal injury matters are handled on contingency — you pay no legal fees unless we recover for you. Disbursements and expert costs are advanced by the firm. Contact us for a free consultation →
Immigration outcomes are not measured in dollar amounts — they are measured in status, protection, and the right to remain in Canada. The following reflect a selection of outcomes across Azimi Law's immigration litigation practice.
Leave granted, stays of removal, judicial reviews, and mandamus applications before the Federal Court of Canada.
Leave granted and Federal Court allowed the application — RPD decision quashed on grounds of unreasonable credibility findings unsupported by the record. Matter remitted to a different RPD member for fresh determination.
Client retained with deportation scheduled within 24 hours. Judicial review application and stay motion filed the same day — Federal Court stay granted, halting removal while the underlying judicial review proceeded.
Permanent residency application delayed beyond three years with no decision. Following a pre-litigation demand letter by Azimi Law, IRCC processed the application within 30 days — no court filing was ultimately required.
Work permit refusal by an overseas IRCC visa officer quashed by the Federal Court on judicial review — officer failed to engage with key evidence in the application record and applied an incorrect legal test to the LMIA-exempt category.
Removal order appeals, sponsorship refusals, residency obligation challenges, and detention reviews before the IAD.
IAD removal order appeal allowed on humanitarian and compassionate grounds despite established serious criminality inadmissibility — client's degree of establishment, family ties, and rehabilitation evidence persuaded the Division to exercise discretionary relief.
CBSA sought continued detention on flight risk grounds. Azimi Law assembled a release plan with cash deposit and surety and presented compelling evidence of community ties — Immigration Division ordered release at the 7-day review.
Spousal sponsorship application refused by an overseas visa officer on genuineness grounds. IAD appeal filed with fresh evidence of the couple's ongoing relationship — appeal allowed and the matter remitted for final processing.
Important disclosure: Past results are not a guarantee of future outcomes. Every case turns on its unique facts, evidence, and applicable law. These summaries are provided for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. Nothing on this page should be construed as a representation regarding the likely outcome of your matter.
Have a question about your matter? Send us a brief message and we will respond promptly.
416-900-4128Mon–Fri 9 AM–5 PM · For urgent immigration matters, call directly.
Personal injury consultations are free. Civil and immigration matters are assessed individually. Call Azimi Law.