Please read. This tool provides general information about assessing IRCC processing delay for a possible mandamus application, for educational purposes only. It is not legal advice, does not determine whether your delay is legally unreasonable, and using it does not create a lawyer-client relationship. Your privacy is protected. Everything you enter is processed entirely in your own browser — it is not transmitted to, collected, or stored by Azimi Law unless you deliberately choose to contact us below. Current as of July 26, 2026. IRCC processing times change frequently; this tool does not look them up for you and accepts no responsibility for outdated figures you enter. Always confirm the current published time on IRCC's own website and get legal advice before acting. Last updated: July 26, 2026.
What this tool adds: Azimi Law's mandamus evidence guide explains how to build a full chronology and demand record. This evaluator instead gives you a quick, honest first read — how your wait compares to IRCC's own estimate, and which of the recognized legal factors already point in your favour.

Before you start: Look up IRCC's current published processing time for your application type at canada.ca's processing times tool, and enter that number below — using a stale or remembered figure will skew the comparison.

From IRCC's live processing time tool — see link above.

Factors courts consider (Conille v. Canada)
I've satisfied every document, biometric, and interview requestNo outstanding request is sitting on your side
IRCC hasn't given a clear, specific explanation for the delayGeneric "still in progress" replies don't count as an explanation
You've made at least one clear, documented request for a decisionA focused enquiry, not necessarily repeated webforms
The delay is causing concrete, specific harmFamily separation, inability to work/study, expiring status, health impact
Enter your dates above

How courts assess "unreasonable" delay

Mandamus is an extraordinary, discretionary remedy available through judicial review under sections 18 and 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act. The leading test from Conille v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 F.C. 33, asks whether the delay has been longer than the nature of the process reasonably requires; whether the applicant and counsel are not responsible for the delay; and whether the authority responsible has not provided a satisfactory justification. No published processing estimate is, on its own, a legal entitlement to a decision by a fixed date — it is context, not a guarantee.

Questions people ask

IRCC updates published processing times monthly and they vary by application type and office. Rather than rely on a number that may already be stale, this tool asks you to check IRCC's live processing time tool and enter the current figure for an accurate comparison.

No. Exceeding a published estimate is one relevant fact, not a legal test on its own. Courts apply the factors from Conille v. Canada — whether the delay is longer than the process reasonably requires, whether you or your counsel caused any of it, and whether IRCC has offered a satisfactory explanation.

Volume alone rarely helps either your processing or a future mandamus case. A small number of clear, documented enquiries and IRCC's responses (or silence) are more useful than repeated form submissions.

Official sources

Rules and government guidance may change. Review the current source and obtain advice for a live matter.

Application stuck in processing?

A boutique, client-first injury and immigration firm on your side — in English or Farsi. Free · No win, no fee.

Want a lawyer to look at your specific timeline?

Leave your email and a member of Azimi Law will follow up. Using this evaluator is always free and private — sharing your email is entirely optional.