When a claimant’s LTD claim approaches the 24-month definition change, insurers routinely retain vocational rehabilitation consultants to assess employment potential. These assessors review the claimant’s education, work history, and functional limitations and identify sedentary or light-duty occupations they assert the claimant could perform. The insurer then uses this report as the basis for terminating benefits.
Ontario courts have scrutinized insurer-commissioned vocational assessments carefully and found many to be legally insufficient. A vocational report identifying theoretical occupations without regard to availability, the claimant’s realistic competitive position, actual wages offered, or the real state of the labour market does not establish that the claimant can engage in any occupation for which they are reasonably suited. Courts require that the identified occupation be one the claimant could actually obtain and perform.
Functional capacity as gatekeeper: Any vocational assessment exceeding the claimant’s documented functional capacity is invalid. If a physiatrist has documented inability to sit for more than 30 minutes, a vocational report identifying full-time sedentary work as available employment cannot withstand challenge. The functional capacity evidence governs what the vocational assessor can legitimately identify.
The most effective response combines: an updated comprehensive functional capacity evaluation from an experienced occupational therapist; updated specialist medical opinions addressing the functional demands of the insurer’s identified occupations; a responding vocational report from your own vocational expert; and, where appropriate, a psychiatric or psychological assessment confirming cognitive and emotional limitations preclude competitive employment regardless of physical capacity.