Adnan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
This page is a summary and commentary on a publicly available court decision, written for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create a lawyer-client relationship with Azimi Law, regardless of how specific or applicable it may seem to your situation.
This summary may be incomplete, simplified, or not reflect the most current state of the law — the decision may be appealed, distinguished, or overtaken by later rulings. Independently verify this case against the official decision before relying on it. Nothing here guarantees the outcome of any other matter, including yours.
Do not rely on this page to make decisions about your own situation. Consult a licensed lawyer, or contact Azimi Law to discuss your situation directly.
The Facts
Mr. Adnan applied to sponsor his grandmother under the 2023 Parents and Grandparents Program. In March 2024 IRCC wrote giving him 30 days to supply missing items and warning that the application would otherwise be returned unprocessed. The record showed a completed family information form and a death certificate were still missing. In a letter of April 30, 2024, IRCC returned the application as incomplete. He challenged that letter, arguing among other things that his consultant had inadvertently failed to submit one document.
What the Court Decided
The Court dismissed the application. Under the Ministerial Instructions that govern the program, an officer who finds an application incomplete must return it, so the letter was not a refusal; it was the return of an application that had never been accepted for processing, and the Court held it is not a reviewable matter under section 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act. Officers have no discretion to overlook missing required documents, even small ones. The applicant remains responsible for the completeness of an application filed on his behalf, so the consultant's omission did not help him.
Adnan is one of the leading decisions IRCC points to when it argues that a return for incompleteness is not open to court review. Read together with the later Devgon decision, it shows where the line is drawn and why the exact reason for a return matters.
Does This Affect You?
- ✓IRCC returned your Parents and Grandparents Program or other sponsorship application as incomplete after giving you a deadline.
- ✓A representative or consultant overlooked a document, and you want to know whether the Court will excuse it.
- ✓You are deciding whether to file a judicial review of a letter returning your application, as opposed to a refusal.
Key Takeaways
- A return for non-compliance with Ministerial Instructions may be treated as outside the Court's review powers, in contrast to a return based on a requirement the rules do not actually contain.
- Mistakes by a representative are generally treated as the applicant's own for completeness purposes.
- Respond to every request for missing documents on time and keep proof of what was submitted.